‘I Hope You Read Prayerfully’: Huckabee Slams Critics Of Christian Zionism

Last week, the Patriarchs and Heads of Churches in Jerusalem issued a joint statement asserting their exclusive authority over the Christian flock in the Holy Land. The letter condemned “Christian Zionism” as a damaging ideology that harms Christian unity and serves political agendas. This prompted a sharp rebuttal from U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee and an extensive deconstruction from evangelical circles.

The original statement claimed that the historic Apostolic Churches are the sole representatives of the Christian faith in the region. It accused “local individuals” of advancing ideologies that mislead the public and interfere with the internal life of the church. The Patriarchs expressed concern that these individuals—likely referring to a massive delegation of 1,000 U.S. pastors that visited in December 2025—were being welcomed at official levels by the Israeli government, which they viewed as a threat to the indigenous Christian presence.

U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee responded by rejecting the notion of “exclusivity” in representing the Christian faith. His response focused on several key points.

Huckabee argued that no single sect should claim a monopoly on the Christian viewpoint, noting that the evangelical tradition is a “global and growing” force. He asserted that the foundation of Christianity is Judaism. He argued that if God could break His covenant with the Jewish people, Christians would have no assurance that He would keep His covenant with them. “The thought that God is even capable of breaking a covenant is anathema to those of us who embrace Holy Scripture as the authority of the church. If God can or would break His covenant with the Jews, then what hope would Christians have that He would keep His covenant with us?” he stated.

Huckabee redefined the term, stating that a Zionist is simply someone who believes the Jewish people have a right to live in their ancestral homeland. He expressed confusion as to why anyone claiming the “moniker ‘Christian'” would not also be a Zionist. He urged the Patriarchs to focus on shared truths—such as the sanctity of life and marriage—rather than jurisdictional disputes.

In response to the statement of non-evangelical churches in Israel, I issued the following. I hope you will read prayerfully.

I love my brothers and sisters in Christ from traditional, liturgical churches and respect their views, but I do not feel any sect of the Christian… pic.twitter.com/jqohEWk0xJ

— Ambassador Mike Huckabee (@GovMikeHuckabee) January 20, 2026

A viral social media post by an Evangelical Christian further deconstructed the Patriarchs’ letter, arguing it was an “institutional-political statement” rather than a theological one. The critique followed several lines of reasoning.

The post noted a “critical omission”: the Patriarchs’ letter cited only one verse (Romans 12:5) regarding unity, but failed to address the numerous scriptures regarding God’s covenant with Israel. The critique highlighted that the letter ignored Romans 11:29, which states God’s calling is “irrevocable,” and Jeremiah 31:35-37, which ties Israel’s existence to the permanence of the sun and stars.

The deconstruction argued that the decline of the Christian population in the Holy Land is not caused by Christian Zionism. It provided statistics to shift the focus: In Bethlehem, the Christian population was 86% in 1950, but dropped to approximately 12% by 2026.

The post cited economic collapse, Islamist intimidation, and property disputes under Palestinian Authority control—factors unrelated to Evangelical theology—as the primary causes of emigration.

The post argued the letter was a response to “anxiety over loss of control.” By bypassing traditional hierarchies to meet with Israeli officials, external Christian groups threatened the Patriarchs’ “monopoly on the Christian voice.” The critique labeled the Patriarchs’ claim of “exclusive representation” as a “category error,” asserting that theological beliefs do not require ecclesiastical permission.

The critique slammed the letter for being strategically vague. By not naming the “local individuals” or specific “activities,” the Patriarchs created an “ambient guilt” that allowed them to signal disapproval without having to engage in a documented theological debate.

https://t.co/k9dJ8q9HYB

— Insurrection Barbie (@DefiyantlyFree) January 19, 2026

While the Patriarchs appealed to historic institutional authority, Huckabee and the Evangelical response appealed to the literal interpretation of Biblical covenants, suggesting that the “unity” requested by the Jerusalem leaders was actually a demand for institutional submission.