Top Dems Scramble To Explain Why They’re On The Wrong Side Of Voter ID

Feb 8, 2026 - 17:28
 0  0
Top Dems Scramble To Explain Why They’re On The Wrong Side Of Voter ID

Two top Democrats put in some extra effort to oppose voter identification initiatives — even as polling indicates that a broad majority of their own voters favor the policy.

4 Fs

Live Your Best Retirement

Fun • Funds • Fitness • Freedom

Learn More
Retirement Has More Than One Number
The Four Fs helps you.
Fun
Funds
Fitness
Freedom
See How It Works

Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) joined ABC’s Jonathan Karl and CNN’s Dana Bah, respectively, to explain why they have continued to oppose a policy that has overwhelming support from both parties and across multiple demographics.

On “This Week,” Karl referenced a recent Pew Research Center poll in which 83% of respondents said they would support voter identification requirements — and that when broken down by party, 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats would support such measures.

“Is that something that you can support? And if not, why?” Karl asked.

“It’s still going to be something, Jonathan, it’s still going to be something that disenfranchises people that don’t have the proper Real ID, driver’s license ID that don’t have the ID necessary to vote even though they are citizens,” Schiff claimed. “This is another way to simply try to suppress the vote. And the last thing I think we want to do is discourage more people, more citizens from voting.”

On CNN’s “state of the Union,” Jeffries could easily have been reading from the same script as Schiff as he responded to a similar lines of questioning from anchor Dana Bash.

“I understand that you don’t support things like a passport, for example,” Bash began. “But requiring basic ID in order to vote is really popular. A Pew poll from a few months ago showed 83% of Americans, including 71% of your fellow Democrats, support requiring an ID to vote. Why are they wrong?”

“I haven’t said that they’re wrong,” Jeffries insisted before explaining why he was still opposed to the measure. “We know that states are the ones that are empowered to conduct elections, and every state should be allowed to decide the best way to proceed to ensure that there’s a free and fair election.”

“The question is that — what Republicans are trying to do is to engage in clear and blatant voter suppression,” he added.

Neither one explained why it was “suppression” to require voters to have the same kind of identification already required for people who want to purchase alcohol or cigarettes, travel by air, open a bank account, pick up a prescription, or receive government benefits — among other things.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Angry Angry 0
Sad Sad 0
Wow Wow 0
Fibis I am just an average American. My teen years were in the late 70s and I participated in all that that decade offered. Started working young, too young. Then I joined the Army before I graduated High School. I spent 25 years in, mostly in Infantry units. Since then I've worked in information technology positions all at small family owned companies. At this rate I'll never be a tech millionaire. When I was young I rode horses as much as I could. I do believe I should have been a cowboy. I'm getting in the saddle again by taking riding lessons and see where it goes.