Walz turns up at debate with JD Vance to deliver word salad in answer to question

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a far-left extremist picked by Kamala Harris to be her vice president candidate this year, turned up ready for the vice presidential debate with GOP candidate JD Vance on Tuesday night in New York.

And in answer to the first question, about whether Israel should take a first-strike attitude in response to Iran’s terrorist attack just hours earlier, delivered a word salad.

Much like Harris has done over and over.

In response to questions from Nora O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan, CBS moderators who both have expressed their opposition to President Trump, talked about Joe Biden deploying troops to the Middle East.

And he talked about state-sponsored terrorism.

And he talked about “fundamental steady” leadership.

And he talked about President Trump, “nearly 80-year-old” in the presidential debate against Harris earlier.

He talked about Vladimir Putin and North Korea.

But no answer.

Vance pointed out that it is up to Israel to make that decision, based on what its population feels in needed to protect themselves.

Tim Walz seems to lose his footing as he speaks, stumbling over the difference between Iran and Israel, and seeming to pause and wait on the words to come to him. #VPdebate pic.twitter.com/py7eZqXZGO

— WorldNetDaily (@worldnetdaily) October 2, 2024

JD Vance on cleaner air and cleaner water: “What have Kamala Harris’ policies actually led to? More energy production in China, more manufacturing overseas, more doing business in some of the dirtiest parts of the entire world.” pic.twitter.com/vetOxXYliG

— WorldNetDaily (@worldnetdaily) October 2, 2024

Iran is as close to a nuclear weapon today than they have ever been, and it happened under the Biden-Harris administration. #VPdebate pic.twitter.com/uVy7C9jJHm

— WorldNetDaily (@worldnetdaily) October 2, 2024

Walz also claimed that Trump left an “agreement” with Iran, apparently referring to the nuclear deal orchestrated by Barack Obama with Iran, and Trump’s explanation at the time was that the deal did nothing or little to hinder Iran’s nuclear plans, including its intention to destroy Israel.

More to come