First New York, Now Minneapolis. Foreign Socialists Are Taking Over.

A few years ago, during the summer of George Floyd, the socialists in the government of Seattle were celebrating. Here’s what one member of Seattle’s city council, an Indian woman by the name of “Kshama Sawant,” wrote on social media at the time:

Our Tax Amazon movement has made history!

Seattle City Council just voted to pass an Amazon Tax on the largest corporations to fund affordable housing & jobs, to begin to end racist gentrification.

This is entirely because of the thousands of working people, unions, socialists!

This was a tax that politicians like “Kshama Sawant” had been pushing for quite some time. Watch:

The promise, as you heard, was to raise hundreds of millions of dollars by taxing the most successful business in the city, and then redistributing that money towards “union jobs, affordable housing” and “energy efficient buildings.”

In other words, she’s going to steal money from productive companies, and redistribute it to various Left-wing projects and handouts. Never mind the fact that “Kshama Sawant” has never created anything of value since arriving in this country in her mid-20s. She’s a socialist, so therefore, she gets to dictate how the economy of Seattle will work. That’s the idea.

And for several years, Seattle went along with it. They put foreign socialism into action. How did it turn out?

As you’d expect, businesses began leaving Seattle. More workers stayed at home. Companies like Expedia conducted mass layoffs. The result has been less tax revenue and fewer jobs. In other words, socialism failed, as it always does. 

To give you an idea of how dire things have become, here’s a recent headline from one of Seattle’s local news outlets:

‘This is catastrophic’: Seattle payroll tax revenues $47M short as jobs leave city

Here’s how Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell assessed this situation:

Today’s announcement that [payroll tax] revenues collected in 2024 were $47 million lower than projected requires action to ensure our budget remains balanced. … This decrease in revenue is aligned with recent reports of major employers moving thousands of high-paying jobs out of Seattle to other cities in our region.

Imagine that. “Kshama Sawant” became a socialist in India. She brought her ideas to this country. And her ideas, in a very observable way, made this country worse, to the point that the Democrats running the city can’t even deny it. We’re seeing a lot of this lately, if you haven’t noticed. Of course, a few weeks ago, a Muslim socialist — someone who wants to eliminate the police department, establish state-run grocery stores, and nationalize rental properties — dominated the primary in the mayor’s race in New York. He’s very likely to lead New York very soon.

Now, in Minneapolis, a similar election is about to unfold. A Muslim socialist named Omar Fateh, who represents the district where George Floyd overdosed, is now gaining traction in the mayor’s race.

Now, think about that credential. He’s a socialist who represents the district where George Floyd overdosed, which happens to be one of the most dangerous and least desirable places in the country.

To give you some local color, here’s what that means, in practice. This is what “George Floyd Square” was like, post-BLM:

This is Omar Fateh’s home turf. And he wants all of Minneapolis, and indeed all of the United States, to look like this.

Like the Muslim socialist in New York, Omar Fateh is not subtle about his intentions. He’s not hiding anything. Instead, he’s made it very clear that he works with other Somali politicians in Minnesota to advance the interests of Somalia, not the United States. He’s also referred to Somalia as “our home,” even though he was born in Washington and grew up in Virginia. Watch:

He’s essentially admitting that Somali politicians are engaged in a conspiracy against the United States. They’re working together to loot the treasury to serve Somalis. That’s their goal, in every case. It doesn’t matter that Omar Fateh was born here. It doesn’t matter whether his parents were “legal” immigrants or not. None of that matters. His goal remains the same. He was born in America, but he’s not actually an American. America is not his home, as he has proudly admitted. Omar Fateh, like the other Somali politicians in Minnesota, understands that he can take advantage of us. So they’re all doing it, to their great benefit.

By contrast, nobody can provide an example of a single way that the United States has benefited from Somali immigration. It’s easy to think of the drawbacks. There are no positives. None at all. By some estimates, there are more than 150,000 Somalis living in this country. They’ve completely taken over entire neighborhoods in Minnesota and several other states. What have they improved? Have they boosted GDP? Employment rates? IQ averages? That would be quite a trick, since the average IQ in Somalia is something like 70. Have Somalis reduced crime? Have they come up with any new technologies? Have they done anything, except marry their cousins at extremely high rates?

These are questions that have objective answers. And in every case, the answer is “no.” Leftists know they can’t dispute that, so they’ll call you racist for asking the question. But the question needs to be asked: Why are we allowing a single Somali into this country? If nobody can explain how allowing them into our country helps our country, why should we allow it? This is the basic question that should be asked about every policy, at every level. Does this policy help the country? If the answer is no, then obviously the policy should not be enacted.

And while we’re at it — why aren’t we beginning the process of denaturalizing as many of these Somalis as possible? If you join a subversive communist party, your citizenship can be revoked on national security grounds. Additionally, if you didn’t actually abandon any foreign allegiance, then you lied on your application for citizenship, and your citizenship can be revoked. I’m not just talking about Ilhan Omar’s whole fraud with her brother. This is a systemic issue. So when do we start kicking these foreign communists out?

That question is becoming increasingly urgent because at the moment, Omar Fateh stands a very real chance of winning in Minneapolis. And if he wins, he’ll win because of the support of a lot of people who shouldn’t be in this country. And then we’ll all suffer the consequences. In particular, one of his core agenda items will be dismantling the police department and redistributing the money to Somalis — which is something he’s wanted for a long time. Watch:

What could go wrong? You have a young autistic person having a mental breakdown. Why would you ever need to send an armed officer to that kind of situation? It’s not as if autistic, mentally ill people have ever hurt anyone in the history of this country. That would be absurd.

And by the way, his statistic was pretty incredible. He claimed that 47% of calls to the police could be “diverted” to “non-police responses.” That’s a number that some Left-wing academics at NYU came up with. But there’s an obvious problem with the figure, which is that the police don’t know, in advance, whether a call is going to be dangerous. It’s probably true that some “autistic children having a mental breakdown” aren’t violent, and that a social worker could coax them out of it with an ice cream cone or something. But there’s also a chance that the autistic child having a mental breakdown will, indeed, try to kill someone. That’s why you want armed police to respond to as many calls like this as possible. You don’t want to wait until someone gets murdered.

This is all self-explanatory. Even someone as dumb as Omar Fateh understands everything I just said. He knows all of this. In reality, his goal is to legalize certain forms of violence. And again, there’s a lot of this going around. Take domestic violence, for example. Most people would agree that domestic violence is bad, and that police should respond to domestic violence calls — especially since they’re some of the most dangerous calls that police can receive. But just a few years ago, the Muslim socialist in New York, Mamdani, explained that, in his view, the police shouldn’t respond to domestic violence calls.

This is audio that was first reported by the Free Beacon. Listen:

Notice how he just casually mentions “jaywalking” along with “domestic violence.” A lot of people have said that hard-line Islamist beliefs aren’t a part of Mamdani’s platform — and that he’s just a typical Left-wing socialist — but this soundbite would indicate otherwise. There’s a little bit of traditional Islamic teaching creeping in, perhaps. In any event, just consider the comparison he just made. Jaywalking? Beating your wife? What’s the difference? They’re both against the law, and according to Mamdani, laws are bad. Therefore, when New York is under the rule of a Muslim socialist, they won’t have laws anymore, or police to enforce them.

The only way to combat this very rapid rise in third-world governance is to treat these socialist invaders like the threat that they are. There can’t be any compromises whatsoever. Denaturalization and deportations are a big part of that. We also need to establish prisons like the ones they have in El Salvador, for the deterrent effect. Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida seems to understand that. He’s just opened a new detention facility for illegal aliens in Florida that his administration is calling “Alligator Alcatraz,” as you’ve probably heard. The administration repurposed a state-owned airfield west of Miami in the Everglades. And the idea, of course, is that if any illegal aliens try to escape, they’ll get eaten by alligators. Or, failing that, a hurricane might get them.

Predictably, because they’re aligned with the foreigners who want to undermine this country’s national security, Democrats are falling over themselves to explain why this idea — which is obviously very good — is somehow terrible and unacceptable. Here’s Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a member of Congress from Florida, to deliver the best line of argument that Democrats could come up with:

Yes, “they brush their teeth where they poop, in the same unit.”

I’ll say that again. These illegal aliens — criminals who have no right to be in this country — are being forced, against their will, to “brush their teeth where they poop.” Can you imagine the utter horror of being subjected to something like that? Can you imagine having to brush your teeth where you poop? My God.

Now, if you happen to have something called a “bathroom,” you might see the problem here. “Debbie Wasserman Schultz — who keeps getting re-elected despite lacking any form of charisma or authenticity whatsoever — is going into hysterics over the fact that these illegal aliens have bathrooms inside this detention facility. And then she complains about the privacy wall, which is only “three feet tall,” apparently. You have to wonder if “Debbie Wasserman Schultz” has ever heard of the concept of a prison. For that matter, you have to wonder if she’s ever seen what sailors have to deal with on deployment — to say nothing of the forward operating bases in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. Actually, you don’t have to wonder about any of this. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is a fundamentally dishonest person, so nothing she says has any value whatsoever.

More to the point, even if the situation at that facility is kind of rough (and I haven’t seen any evidence of that), the illegals are still being treated with more kindness and humanity than most countries outside of the Western world treat people who try to sneak across their borders. The fact is that illegal migrants are waging an assault on our country and our sovereignty. It might be ugly, but our illegal immigration problem is ugly. There is no pretty way to deal with an ugly thing.

The Trump administration seems to understand that, which is why they’re using Blackhawks and armored vehicles to raid marijuana farms. Watch:

We need to see much, much more of this. It’s not enough to go after illegal aliens. You have to target the people who are employing them. In this case, the facts were particularly bad. There were nearly a dozen children on-site, even though children obviously shouldn’t be growing marijuana. One of the adults overseeing the workers was a convicted child predator. Apparently a Gavin Newsom donor ran the place as well.

But none of this should be necessary in order for ICE to act. Anyone who employs illegal aliens — even if they’re not growing marijuana and employing pedophiles — should receive the exact same treatment. This has to continue until illegal aliens see no value in coming to this country and obtaining employment.

At the moment, instead, Left-wing activists and illegal aliens are emboldened. One of them was caught on camera shooting at ICE agents during a raid on one of these farms. And in just the past two weeks, a heavily armed terrorist opened fire at a Border Patrol office in Texas, injuring two officers before he was taken out.

Meanwhile ten suspects were charged with attempted murder for engaging in a coordinated attack on a separate ICE facility in Texas. They allegedly lured agents out of the facility with fireworks before firing more than a dozen rounds, including one round that hit an officer in the neck. Fortunately the officer who was shot wasn’t seriously wounded.

Watching all of this domestic terrorism, judges with foreign names are, of course, taking the side of the terrorists. A federal judge in California named Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, for example, just issued a bizarre injunction claiming, in effect, that ICE is rounding up people because of the color of their skin. And according to the injunction, which is based on five declarations from random people, ICE needs to stop doing that immediately.

This is an injunction that will have no effect whatsoever. That’s because, in reality, what ICE is doing — as judge “Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong” understands very well — is enforcing the law. All that’s necessary to be detained in this country is a “reasonable suspicion” that you’re committing a crime. If you’re standing around at a car wash, and then run away when ICE pulls up, you’ve just provided “reasonable suspicion.” If you’re a child and you’re working on a marijuana farm, you’ve provided “reasonable suspicion.” And for that matter, if you openly admit that you’re conspiring against the United States for the benefit of a foreign country, you’ve provided “reasonable suspicion” that you lied to obtain citizenship. And you should go back where you came from.

We are well past the point where anyone can pretend that there’s a middle-ground, compromise solution here. Foreign nations are telling us what they want to do to our country. Even after we’ve elected them to Congress, made them judges, and funded their fraudulent nonprofits, they still want to mine us for everything we have, so they can send it back “home.” That’s their stated position. And it’s not just Somalis doing this.

From the Washington Post:

Over the last quarter century, the volume of remittances sent to Central American countries has increased more than tenfold, particularly following the pandemic. Migrant cash transfers rose from 10 percent of the Central American region’s GDP in 2010 to 23 percent last year…

Yes, cash transfers from the United States to foreign nationals back “home” are now keeping many of these Central American countries afloat. We are subsidizing the rest of the world. And when we import more foreign nationals, the subsidy only increases, as we become poorer and more dysfunctional. The solution is to tax remittances by about 10,000%, but in their latest spending bill, Congress just refused to do so. So now we’re left with mass deportation and denaturalization as the only solution. That’s the only practical way forward.

And the more socialists open their mouths — from New York to Minnesota to federal courtrooms in Los Angeles — the more they prove my point. It shouldn’t even be controversial, really. After all, these people speak fondly of their “home” countries. They send huge sums of money to their “home countries.” Now it’s time for them to go back home — and for the rest of us to begin to undo the damage that “cultural enrichment” and mass migration have wrought.