Trump Can Prevent a Genocide in Sudan

Aug 23, 2025 - 13:28
 0  0
Trump Can Prevent a Genocide in Sudan

A genocide may be about to quietly unfold in Sudan. But it’s not too late to stop it. President Donald Trump and U.S. officials must increase pressure on the Rapid Support Forces and the United Arab Emirates, which holds considerable sway over the Rapid Support Forces, to stop the disaster and save the nearly 1 million Sudanese civilians at risk.

The Rapid Support Forces controls all the Darfur region in western Sudan except for one town—el Fasher. Experts have been warning about the dire situation in el Fasher since the Rapid Support Forces began besieging the town in April 2024. Over a year later, the Rapid Support Forces—with Emirati backing—is escalating efforts to capture the town once and for all. While the town’s defenders cling on, the Rapid Support Forces made its first major incursion into the town in July and has surged reinforcements to the area in August.

The Rapid Support Forces has created a humanitarian disaster in el Fasher. The siege has displaced 780,000 people and trapped at least 900,000 civilians in the town and surrounding refugee camps. Making matters worse, the Rapid Support Forces has blocked humanitarian assistance from entering the area, leaving those trapped in the town—primarily women and children—surviving on animal feed and food waste and facing famine and starvation.

The Rapid Support Forces starving of el Fasher is one of many war crimes, including crimes against humanity, that it has committed. The group overran the Zamzam refugee camp on el Fasher’s southern outskirts in April, which locals say killed over 1,500 people, making it the second-largest atrocity of the war. A recent Guardian report vividly detailed the nearly 72-hour slaughter that the Rapid Support Forces inflicted on those in the camp. Among the atrocities are widespread summary executions of civilians, including women and children, forcible deportation, and rape—all of which are crimes against humanity under international law.

The Rapid Support Forces’ brutality extends to acts of ethnic cleansing and possible genocide. Rapid Support Forces’ militants systematically targeted non-Arab ethnic civilians during the assault on Zamzam. The largest atrocity in the war occurred when the Rapid Support Forces captured el Geneina, the capital of West Darfur state. The result was exponentially worse than Zamzam. The Rapid Support Forces killed up to 15,000 civilians in a “systematic” mass ethnic cleansing campaign against the Massalit—a non-Arab ethnic group—that lasted several months, which the United States declared a genocide. The Rapid Support Forces’ despicable behavior should surprise no one, given the group grew out of the infamous Janjaweed militias that perpetrated the 2000s Darfur genocide.

El Geneina and Zamzam are a preview of the horror that will likely unfold in el Fasher, but the scale will be much larger. Compared to the nearly 900,000 civilians trapped in the el Fasher area, el Geneina had a pre-war population of nearly 540,000, and Zamzam housed nearly 400,000 refugees. The United Nations and other international observers have warned repeatedly that the Rapid Support Forces could perpetrate a genocide if it captures el Fasher.

The United States should encourage the UAE to use its influence over the Rapid Support Forces to avert disaster. Significant evidence from the United Nations and others indicate that the UAE is supporting the Rapid Support Forces, including in the current offensive. The UAE has likely helped facilitate reinforcements for the Rapid Support Forces campaign, including by helping set up a support hub in southeastern Libya and—according to the Sudanese Armed Forces—helping bring Colombian mercenaries into western Sudan.

Aside from engaging the UAE directly, the United States should work with others in relevant multilateral institutions, such as the African Union, Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and U.N., to create a united front. U.S. officials should continue to speak out and channel these words into actions, such as backing resolutions and possible multilateral sanctions against the Rapid Support Forces, UAE, and any other Rapid Support Forces backers before and during the upcoming U.N. General Assembly in September.

Abu Dhabi already allegedly stopped a previous assault on el Fasher, when it reportedly told the Rapid Support Forces to call off an attack following a U.N. resolution in June 2024.

The U.S. should make clear that capturing el Fasher will be punished—not rewarded—in upcoming peace talks. The U.S. planned to hold peace talks with the major regional players tied to the war—Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE—in July. However, the talks were postponed until at least September, after the UAE insisted on “last-minute amendment” to the planned joint statement that wouldban the Sudanese Armed Forces from a postwar transitional process, which Egypt—an Sudanese Armed Forces ally—rejected. Intentional or not, the delay contributed to the current moment by giving the Rapid Support Forces a window to launch its latest assault and gain more leverage before talks resume.

Even if a crisis is temporarily averted, the United States and international community must develop a long-term plan to save the civilians in el Fasher, who will continue to be unsafe as long as the Rapid Support Forces controls the area.

One option is establishing an African Union or U.N. civilian protection force, as both organizations jointly did during the 2000s Darfur genocide. Given that the international will for such a force likely does not exist, an alternative option is a humanitarian evacuation of these civilians out of Rapid Support Forces-held territory as a “measure of last resort.”

These efforts require sustained diplomatic engagement, which Trump can secure by appointing an envoy to Sudan. Trump’s Africa advisor, Massad Boulous, has done a commendable job engaging all factions involved in the war, but he is one person covering the whole continent, and Sudan needs more focused attention. The Senate and House have shown bipartisan support for an envoy. Time is of the essence, and appointing an envoy will help address current and future crises and long-term peace efforts.

Sudan has not received the attention it deserves as the world’s largest humanitarian and refugee crisis, but Trump has thankfully taken an interest. In the 2000s, the world failed to keep its promise of “never again” to the Sudanese people. Trump can avoid a repeat and ensure that the world’s promise is fulfilled.

Originally published by RealClearWorld.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.

The post Trump Can Prevent a Genocide in Sudan appeared first on The Daily Signal.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Angry Angry 0
Sad Sad 0
Wow Wow 0
Fibis I am just an average American. My teen years were in the late 70s and I participated in all that that decade offered. Started working young, too young. Then I joined the Army before I graduated High School. I spent 25 years in, mostly in Infantry units. Since then I've worked in information technology positions all at small family owned companies. At this rate I'll never be a tech millionaire. When I was young I rode horses as much as I could. I do believe I should have been a cowboy. I'm getting in the saddle again by taking riding lessons and see where it goes.