Behind The Left’s Friendly Smile Is One DISGUSTING Punchline

“I feel f*cked up saying this. It’s scary being a public speaker. And I mean, look, ever since that guy Charlie Kirk got murdered — and I shouldn’t say this publicly — but I feel better. I know I shouldn’t say that, but it’s just a feeling. I didn’t ask to feel this way. I just be driving around like, ‘Why am I in such a good mood? Oh!'”

That was Dave Chappelle, a comedian. Comedians are held to a different standard than other people, mainly because they’re supposed to be joking.

But that was not really a joke. It wasn’t even close to a joke. It reflected deep, underlying hatred.

Let’s be clear. The supposedly “tolerant,” “optimistic” Left is filled with that hatred.

Some members of the Democratic Party don’t feel this way. But there are also a lot of Democrats who pretend to be uncomfortable with this trash but are, in reality, fine with it.

There’s a game being played in which many of the pseudo-moderates of the Democratic Party pretend to dislike the radicals, and then promptly work with them to shove the Overton Window — the range of acceptable discourse — far to the left.

Dave Chappelle will hide behind the fact that he’s a comedian because this is the game: Clown nose on, clown nose off. He’s a political analyst when he doesn’t wish to be taken as a jokester. But the minute he says something controversial, the clown nose is back on. It was all a joke, you see.

We can tell the difference between a joke and what is not a joke. In fact, Chappelle told another joke that same night that’s not getting quite the same play — for a reason. It’s a bad joke, but it does live in the joke universe.

“I’m sure Charlie Kirk is looking up at us right now, laughing so hard he can’t breathe.”

Chappelle took that from a joke that Tony Hinchcliffe did during the roast of Kevin Hart back in May.

“The black community is so proud of you right now. Right now George Floyd is looking up at us all laughing so hard he can’t breathe,” Hinchcliffe said.

This was Chappelle taking that same joke, inserting the name Charlie Kirk for George Floyd, and then telling it. The very fact that Chappelle puts Charlie Kirk, a political activist not arrested or accused of any crime, in the same category as George Floyd — an arrested criminal who experienced excited delirium in a cop car and then died under disputed circumstances — is pretty telling.

But again, Chappelle’s George Floyd/Tony Hinchcliffe comparison joke is a troll designed to elicit a response from the Right so he can say, “You don’t like free speech.”

But it’s the other joke that’s not really a joke. Chappelle is obviously perfectly fine seeing conservatives get shot to death.

Side note to conservatives, because this is something we’ve been dealing with in the conservative movement for decades at this point: Just because a famous person might agree with you on one core issue — say, trans radicalism, the way Chappelle does — doesn’t mean that person is decent, or a thought leader for your side, or worthy of broad respect.  

Back to Chappelle and the far-Left. The far-Left is perfectly happy with violence against the Right. Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan of the “I’ve Had It” podcast were cracking up at a comment about Charlie Kirk’s death.

They read, “Dread Moroz says, ‘We’re digging up Charlie Kirk and doing it again.’” That prompted them to laugh and laugh.

Pretty evil people.

The podcast posted an apology. There were a bunch of sponsors who dropped them. But their fans showed up to defend them.

“We laughed at a joke about Charlie Kirk. It was an insensitive joke, and we should not have laughed. We regret it, and we apologize. Whatever our political differences, there’s nothing funny about gun violence. We’ve long supported common-sense gun safety reform,” the two wrote in a post on the show’s Instagram page.

Oh, that was the issue: gun violence. You don’t want to be shown as supportive of gun violence.

Not the fact that you laughed at the murder of a political opponent, but the fact that it might seem like you’re okay with gun violence.

So they donated to Everytown for Gun Safety, the largest gun violence prevention organization in America, saying, “We’ll keep using our platforms to fight for the safety of all Americans.”

The sin, according to the podcast, was not that they were laughing at Charlie Kirk’s murder. It was that they might have legitimized guns. Other commenters were totally on their side. One commenter said, “You don’t need to apologize. Charlie wouldn’t have.” Another one said, “Why are you showing empathy? Charlie hated that. Honor him with your disrespect.”

Someone said, “I don’t think he heard it. You’re good.”

These posts have thousands or tens of thousands of likes on X, which has become a trash machine.

This isn’t foreign to Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan. Remember, these are the same people who brag about how much they hate Trump and everyone who voted for Trump.

“I have so much more hate to give towards him,” Welch gushed, continuing:

I’ve barely even tapped into it. I would say out of my potential of hating him 100%. I’m only 10 to 15% there. I still have eighty-five more percent to realize in these next two terms. Like, I feel invigorated. I feel like, my God, I can go, I’m going to go, here’s 5% more hate here. Here’s three more percent there. And I can just go, I mean, and this show is going to be full-blown nonstop hater-Aid, hater-Aid for the country because there’s going to be no Kumbaya. No, I will hate this motherf*cker forever and ever and ever and everybody that voted for him.

Not just Trump, everybody who voted for him. That is the underlying glue that is holding together much of the left-wing coalition. “But hey,” they say, “it’s just the radicals.”

It’s the same line from when Hasan Piker was campaigning with half the Democratic Party: He was just “some podcaster from California.”

They’re not really like this, they say. Democrats are moderates.

Pennsylvania Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro, who wants to run for president. put out this tweet over the weekend: “We’re going to more than double Pennsylvania’s minimum wage. Codify abortion rights into our state Constitution. Fund mass transit. Build more housing. These are the commonsense things that Pennsylvanians want done. And with a Democratic trifecta, we will deliver on all of them.”

Moderation, right?

After all, the new Democratic caucus is filled with amazing people like Howdy Doody Pastor James Talarico, the biggest celeb, because he is the new senator from Texas. He opened “Saturday Night Live” by being bipartisan and kind, generous, and clean-cut.

Except for one thing: Guess who he was with to close out SNL?

Dave Chappelle. Chris Rock, who once said you weren’t allowed to tell jokes about Barack Obama because he was like your father. And Druski, who became best known over the past year for a skit mocking Erika Kirk, widow of the assassinated Charlie Kirk.

They’re all moderate. They’re all wonderful. They don’t have anything in common with the crazies. Not at all.

All the Democratic activists all together, all at once. Isn’t that nice?

The “moderation” is an act. Erika Kirk put out a tweet saying:

To see leftists, podcasters, comedians and commentators laugh about political assassination as though it’s entertainment and the destruction of human life as a punchline is beyond disgusting. My husband, Charlie Kirk, was killed in an act of political violence, something our two children I will live with every day for the rest of our lives.

A culture that laughs at assassination is one of profound moral decay. It threatens the very foundation of our country and the principles that hold our democracy together. You don’t have to agree with someone’s politics to recognize the value of their life. This should not be so hard. Political violence must never be something that’s this country tolerates, excuses or celebrates.

People on all sides of the political aisle are willing to joke about this, particularly about Charlie Kirk. People on the Right and the Left are willing to do this routine.

The moderation is an act. Many of these people are simply lying to you. Zohran Mamdani, a full-fledged member of the Democratic Socialists of America, is now appearing on Fox News to explain that he disagrees with all the elements of the DSA policy proposals.

I don’t believe him because I am not a stupid person. You can tell he is lying whenever he smiles. You’re a fool if you fall for this sort of stuff.

You remember Abdul El-Sayed, the new senator from Michigan? He spent the entire campaign saying that if you mentioned his associations with radical Islam, it’s because you were an Islamophobe. All he wanted to do was talk about “affordability,” right? There was nothing to worry about — at all. If you focused on his radical Islamic beliefs, on his solidarity with terrorists, that was because you were some sort of bigot.

He won. And so now he’s out and proud about it. He jokes, “Look, I have a brother. He’s Muslim, and he and I have a Muslim brotherhood.” He said, “Michigan is the capital of Arab America.”

Scratch the supposedly moderate Democrats or the affordability Democrats, and you find the radicals underneath.

Now they can say all the things they meant all along out loud.

When you hear Democrats say they are moderate, that they’re going to be responsible, get ready.

When the pendulum swings, it really, really swings hard.

What Democrats are about to implement when they get power is going to be truly terrible. 

More from this network:
Domains for Sale · GOTPeople.org · TheDSAPlatform · The Truth About Socialism

Donate to GOTPeople.org