FBI Dumps Bizarre New Details About Trump Assassination Attempt. What Else Are They Hiding?

From the moment a 20-year-old loner somehow managed to shoot Donald Trump in the head — at a pivotal moment in the presidential campaign, just before he was about to assume the GOP nomination and formally select his running mate — the official narrative has never made any sense whatsoever. 

Watch:

An amazing 6:08pm cellphone video behind Trump captures Crooks running along the roof from which he started shooting 3 minutes later.

Follow Crooks in the red circle + watch the slow motion also in this clip. Crooks is always visible but never spotted by the Secret Service? https://t.co/0K7QyzXH5w

— Gerald Posner (@geraldposner) July 31, 2024

Source: @geraldposner/X.com

There were only two options. The first option was that the Secret Service was so utterly incompetent, and so unbelievably lackadaisical with its security measures, that it somehow failed to secure a slightly sloped roof just 150 yards away with direct line of sight to the podium. They just never got around to it, even though they obviously noticed the rooftop during their walkthroughs before the rally. 

Not only that — the Secret Service didn’t bother looking at the roof at any point during the rally, which is how Thomas Crooks managed to get into position without being detected as a significant threat. As one Butler police officer put it, in a conversation captured on bodycam, “I told them, post f*cking guys over here. Why were we not on the roof?”

If you take this version of events at face value, then you would agree that, unironically, the Secret Service, as an agency, should have been dissolved immediately. Replace them with a random Boy Scout troop, if you need to. Give every kid a walkie-talkie and station them on the rooftops. And instantly — for much less money — Donald Trump would have much better protection than he received from his Secret Service detail. 

The Boy Scouts wouldn’t have the cool earpieces or the suits, but they’d likely spot an assassin visibly running on the roof in plain view of everyone in the crowd. And we know this because the crowd did notice Thomas Crooks, long before he opened fire. The Secret Service did not.

Another possible option, of course, is that the Secret Service deliberately allowed Thomas Crooks to open fire. That would explain everything. It would explain, for example, why the Secret Service couldn’t detect Crooks’ drone, even though they had drone-detection equipment that conveniently went down while Crooks’ drone was in the air. 

Watch:

Inside Job ????

Thomas Crooks flew his drone over the Butler County Fairgrounds for (11) minutes, undetected

Just so happens the Secret Service anti drone system was down at exactly the same moment

Crooks climbed on top of the only bldg that didn’t have a surveillance system, it was also the only bldg outside the Secret Service’s security perimeter… despite the fact it was very close to the stage, with a clear sight line to Trump

BTW

Sean Curran was in charge of Trumps security that day…. and now he’s running the Secret Service.. and I’ve lost count on how many attempts there’s been on Trumps life

Time to get to the very bottom of this https://t.co/vGBTGXNuaw

— @Chicago1Ray ???????? (@Chicago1Ray) September 16, 2026

Source: @Chicago1Ray/X.com

This is one of the elements of the assassination attempt that’s rarely discussed, but it’s important to talk about. The Secret Service actually had a counter-drone system at the rally, but according to the inspector general of DHS, it was “manned by a single under-trained operator who did not test the system prior to the morning of the event. When the system malfunctioned, the operator spent several hours attempting to resolve the issue, during which time Thomas Crooks completed his almost 9-minute drone flight undetected.”

That’s the part of the story you may have heard. What’s less known is that, three days before the rally, the Secret Service agents assigned to protect Trump sent an email to the Secret Service’s Technical Security Division requesting an experienced drone operator.

The email read, “Good afternoon, Candidate Trump is expected to be exposed for the entirety of his remarks and will be vulnerable to drone threats. [Trump’s detail] is requesting the Technical Security Division provide an operator for the day of the event.” That was sent on Wednesday, July 10th at 10:23 AM. According to the inspector general, “We found no evidence that Technical Security Division members who received these requests responded to the email.” 

Yes, you heard that correctly. They simply didn’t respond to the email. Then there was a second request, which was actually denied by a member of the Technical Security Division, supposedly because the counter-drone operators were busy at the Republican National Convention, which was to take place a couple of days later. 

When the inspector general interviewed the leader of the counter-drone program at the Technical Security Division, he said that he “tries to cover all outdoor venues” and “would have probably done that trip” in Butler, but he was never made aware of the request.

None of these excuses make any sense. There’s no reason to ignore the email from July 10, obviously. And there’s also no reason to cite the RNC as an excuse since it was taking place two days later. You would think that, if the priority was to protect Trump — who they assessed was vulnerable to drone attacks — they would’ve found a way to send the experienced anti-drone team. But they didn’t do that. Apparently they didn’t even tell the higher-ups about it.

Again, complicity makes more sense than the official narrative. Additionally, if the Secret Service was complicit, it would also potentially explain why the Secret Service managed to deploy highly trained counter-snipers for this rally when they hadn’t used counter-snipers at any of Trump’s previous rallies during the entire campaign. They couldn’t send the anti-drone team, but they were happy to send the counter-snipers. That could make sense, theoretically, if they wanted to get rid of their assassin after the fact, so he couldn’t talk.

If the Secret Service was complicit, it would also help explain why the Secret Service director claimed that the agency had suddenly become afraid of slightly sloped roofs, even though there are plenty of pictures of Secret Service agents being stationed on sloped roofs — including the counter-sniper team at the Butler rally.

You can see the good-slope, bad-slope distinction. It’s actually incredible to look at because the roof with the counter-snipers is actually more sloped than the one Thomas Crooks was on. On top of that, when they were hosing down the roof after the shooting, FBI agents had no problem standing on it.

But the Secret Service director insisted, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that slightly sloped roofs are just too dangerous for Secret Service agents. Here’s now-former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle commenting on the assassination attempt.

Watch:

“Should that roof have been secured?”

Director Kimberly Cheatle: “That building has a sloped roof. There’s a safety factor considered that we wouldn’t want to put somebody up on the sloped roof.” https://t.co/66eteneY4E

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 17, 2024

Source: @EndWokeness/X.com

Yes, they “secured the building from the inside,” which, in practical terms, means they didn’t secure the building at all. They allowed the sniper to climb on top of a building full of cops, simply because a slightly sloped roof was just too dangerous. It’s not remotely coherent. But again, it all makes sense if someone inside the Secret Service wanted to allow Thomas Crooks to take the shot. 

While we’re at it, if the Secret Service deliberately allowed Crooks to get into position, it would also explain why they didn’t have any meaningful radio contact with the local police (who saw Crooks with a rifle, on the rooftop, early enough that Trump could’ve been removed from the stage).

It would explain why Trump’s detail included women who weren’t tall enough to shield him from gunfire or draw their weapons properly. It would explain why the Secret Service ignored local police that Crooks (who the police photographed) was roaming around the rally site with a rangefinder. And on and on. 

All this to say, the so-called “conspiracy theory” that the Secret Service were involved somehow — or that they took orders from someone in the Biden administration who wanted them to leave Trump exposed — makes sense of the events that transpired. It’s a conspiracy theory that makes the massive security failures at Butler more comprehensible and more logical. 

It’s incumbent on our government — especially now that Donald Trump’s administration has been in office for a long time — to provide as much transparency as possible. They need to disclose all the information they have about the assassination attempt in Butler, and in particular, they need to answer every outstanding question about Thomas Crooks — and there are many questions along those lines.

Instead, what’s happened is that we’re getting drip-fed a small number of disclosures that, taken together, make it far more likely that the assassination attempt was the result of a wide-ranging conspiracy within Joe Biden’s government. 

We’re going to go through all of the new revelations. We’re also going to point out all of the holes that remain in the official narrative — because no matter how much you’ve read about this case, odds are, you’re not aware of most of them. 

Maybe the most important new information, which comes from a recent FBI document dump, is that on the afternoon before the assassination attempt, Crooks went to the Clairton Sportsmen’s Club rifle range in Pennsylvania to fire two guns — his AR and an “older military style rifle.” Crooks was specifically practicing a 100-yard shot. By itself, this wasn’t unusual. Crooks became a member of the club in August of 2023, less than a year before the shooting, and visited the range more than 40 times. He spent a variety of holidays at the range, including Christmas Day, Valentine’s Day, and Halloween. As far as everyone knew, he was doing all of this alone. After all, it’s usually pretty difficult to find someone to go shooting with you on every single major holiday.

But according to the FBI’s investigation, on the day before the assassination attempt, camera footage at the range “shows CROOKS talking with another, unknown club member on the range. This member was the only other person on the rifle range.” 

What’s so strange about this is that, by all accounts, Crooks was a loner. He didn’t have any friends. He wasn’t known to strike up conversations with strangers. His colleagues at a nursing home called him an “odd young man,” and he rarely showed emotion or interacted with anyone else, according to his father. 

So who exactly was he talking with at the range? Was it a random stranger? What were they talking about?

It’s clear the FBI thought this conversation at the gun range could be a potential lead. So, according to documents, the FBI retrieved “two images of the unknown individual, [and images of] the unknown individual’s vehicle.” But we have no idea what, if anything, the FBI found. The FBI isn’t telling us whether or not they’ve determined the identity of this individual, or any involvement he might have.

That’s a big problem because there’s additional information to suggest that Crooks — despite being a creepy loner — had several other connections who were interested in helping him acquire firearms. On his Substack, Tom Elliot has been going through the FBI’s latest document dump and has come across this piece of information, which the mainstream press is ignoring.

It turns out that on May 25th, 2024, a “person of interest who resembles the shooter” was at the Keystone Armory in Edinboro, Pennsylvania, for about an hour. And he was “accompanied by a white male believed to be around his mid 30’s and another older white male with a gray beard.” The Thomas Crooks lookalike had booked a 5 p.m. carbine class in Mars, Pennsylvania, that same day. Mars is a short drive from Edinboro. So it’s very plausible it’s the same person. And again, if it is Crooks, that would be very interesting, since he was a loner who had no friends.

So who might these people be? We have no idea. Once again, the FBI documents don’t explain whether any follow-up investigation was conducted, or what the FBI discovered. But there are other pieces of information that suggest Crooks may have had some unusual contacts. As you may remember, the Oversight Project (which is part of the Heritage Foundation) managed to acquire cell phone data from a device tied to Crooks’ home. And according to that data: 

Someone who regularly visited Crooks home and work also visited a building in Washington, DC located in Gallery Place. This is in the same vicinity of an @FBI office on June 26, 2023.

To be clear, there are reasons to be cautious about Heritage’s reporting. The location data didn’t actually point specifically to an FBI field office. It actually pointed to nearby restaurants. And the D.C. downtown area is relatively small, so there are a lot of other reasons why Thomas Crooks (or a family member) might have traveled to D.C. We really don’t know. But together with all these revelations about people Crooks was spending time with, from gun ranges to ammo shops, it’s time we got some clarity from the FBI. Who exactly are these individuals? Have you identified them? Why or why not?

According to these documents, there are other anonymous individuals connected to this case that we still know nothing about. This is from the New York Post.

An “anonymous donor paid for the cremation of President Trump’s would-be assassin, Thomas Crooks, just days after the deadly Butler, Pa., rally shooting. … “Anonymous donor paid for cremation,” reads a note at the end of a summary of an interview the gunman’s father, Matthew, conducted with federal investigators. … The addendum noted that Matthew was “retired” and that his wife was on leave from work, suggesting the family couldn’t come up with the money for Thomas’ funeral arrangements. Matthew explains in other parts of the federal records viewed by The Post that he was “unemployed” at the time of the shooting.

Could this be innocuous? Sure, it could be. Maybe a family member paid for this. But it’s certainly strange since Crooks was released for cremation in around 10 days — with bullet fragments still lodged inside his body before any independent congressional investigators could inspect it. 

Clay Higgins, the congressman from Louisiana, reported that he attempted to inspect Crooks’ body on August 5th, but by that point, it was too late. No one told him Crooks would be cremated. The sheriff and the county coroner had no idea. So given how this looks, we should learn the identity of the person who paid for this cremation. It’s been two years. There’s no reason to keep this information secret. So release it.

While we’re at it, we need to know everything the FBI has uncovered about the figure known as “Willy Tepes.” This is an individual who was totally unknown to the public until a Tucker Carlson documentary reported on his identity. It turns out, Tepes had communicated directly with Crooks on social media — just before Crooks’ online footprint disappeared. And that’s significant because, in his online posts, Tepes explicitly called for political assassinations in the United States. He was so flagrant about it that other users called him a “fed.” This is from a documentary from Citizen Commission, which is an account on X that’s done an extraordinary amount of research into the assassination attempt in Butler. 

Watch:

‘Why does Thomas Crooks’ online profile end virtually as soon as he starts corresponding with this Willy Tepes? Maybe they moved the communications to a different forum that’s not traceable… like Telegram.’
— @megynkelly & @emilyjashinsky

‘One other question that Tucker Carlson’s reporting raised that I really do think needs to be answered is who this Willy Tepes guy is. Because as soon the would-be assassin switched over to hating Donald Trump, you have this Willy Tepes guy in the comments urging him to use political violence.’
— @AnaKasparian on @PiersUncensored

We recovered thousands of Willy Tepes’ messages from the extremist Telegram channels he operated in. He encouraged political violence and discussed assassinations of politicians on US soil.

Key findings from the full investigation ⬇️

— Citizen Commission (@CitizenComm) April 20, 2026

Source: @CitizenComm/X.com

So Tepes is a strange figure who, by his own admission, has been in communication with American and Russian intelligence services. He develops a reputation for talking about political assassinations, to the point that other people think he’s a fed. He’s tied to a fringe group called the Nordic Resistance Movement. And in August 2020, Crooks tagged this guy in a post where he explicitly discusses the possibility of conducting assassinations. 

“IMO the only way to fight the gov is with terrorism style attacks … track down any important people/politicians/military leaders etc and try to assassinate them.” That’s Thomas Crooks speaking to Willy Tepes, on YouTube, using the username “Tom Crooks.” 

There were only two other documented communications from Crooks to Tepes, as reported by Miranda Devine.

These are communications that the FBI claimed did not exist. They flat-out denied that Crooks had ever spoken to Tepes, and they were wrong. This is from a Fox News article dated November 2025:

Reports have surfaced questioning Crooks’ alleged relationship with Antifa-linked individual William Tepes. The FBI told Fox News Digital that there was never any direct communication between Crooks and Tepes. “Crooks posted on YouTube. Tepes is a Norwegian, nordic resistance member. He simply responded to content Crooks posted,” Patel said, pointing to a comment Tepes made on a 2020-era video posted on the video-sharing platform by Crooks. … As for his online presence, Bongino said previous FBI leadership initially downplayed his digital footprint. “The degree of his digital footprint was not messaged correctly at all by prior leadership,” Bongino said.

In the same interview where they attack the Biden administration for lying about Crooks’ online posts, they’re spreading false information about Crooks’ online posts. He did indeed speak directly to Tepes. We have the screenshots. They’re claiming that Tepes merely responded to Crooks, and that it was a one-way interaction. But that’s not true. Crooks spoke to Tepes directly. And they weren’t talking about the weather. They were talking about murdering political figures in the United States.

More importantly, shortly after these interactions, Crooks goes totally dark. That would imply that, if they carried on further conversations, they did so in a way that might be difficult to track.

That’s not far-fetched because, in this latest FBI document dump, we learn that Crooks was using several encrypted email services. This is from Tom Elliot’s reporting again:

An analyst reviewing Crooks’ phone found it had repeatedly accessed Mailfence — described in the file as “an encrypted email service hosted in Belgium” — between April 15 and July 8, 2024, across what appear to be four separate account IDs… On July 15, two days after the shooting, FBI Counterterrorism sent formal “Foreign Dissemination Requests” to two governments, names redacted, asking for “any and all records” on accounts found on the device  Rep. Mike Waltz later said the accounts traced to Belgium, New Zealand, and Germany. What those governments sent back, if anything, is not [contained in the document dump].

You might conclude that if Crooks was coordinating with Willy Tepes at all, there would’ve been no way for the U.S. government to know about it. After all, these are just random people on the internet — even if it’s true, as Tepes said, that he had attracted the attention of some intelligence services. But the narrative gets a little more complicated when you look at the timeline concerning the Nordic Resistance Movement, according to Citizen Commission’s documentary. 

The Nordic Resistance Movement — a tiny group consisting of a few hundred people at most — was suddenly attracting some very high-level attention from the U.S. government.  That would suggest that, in all likelihood, the CIA and FBI were monitoring online communications from members of this group. 

Certainly, you’d think the CIA would notice if a member of this group was openly talking about assassinating U.S. officials and trying to recruit U.S. citizens to participate in these assassinations. If not, our intelligence agencies are somehow worse than we could’ve possibly imagined. It’s an extremely small number of people that we’re talking about here. It’s not like the Nordic Resistance Movement has a million members. So you would imagine that they’d be relatively simple to track.

The other possibility is that someone in the U.S. government was aware of this grooming while it was taking place. Maybe Tepes was an informant working with U.S. intelligence and was warning them about Crooks. Or maybe someone in the U.S. government was actively encouraging Tepes to murder Donald Trump. We really have no idea, because again, no one in the government has told us anything about Tepes, one way or the other. 

They could release a statement tomorrow confirming they’ve never heard of this guy, never interviewed him, never even knew he existed until random people on the internet discovered Crooks’ social media accounts. In that case, they’d have to explain how they missed this, and a lot of heads would roll. But they haven’t done that. They haven’t done anything.

In fact, more accurately, they’ve apparently been lying to us about what they’ve known about Crooks’ social media footprint. So let’s look at the timeline of what the FBI has said. 

In July of 2024, right after the assassination, the FBI immediately gets into Crooks’ phone (roughly 40 minutes after getting it to Quantico). They discover his online presence and his encrypted messaging apps, including emails with foreign service providers. According to Fox News, the FBI stated that the FBI examined “35 accounts linked to Crooks, including social media, bank and other online accounts. … “The FBI has been able to access all of the accounts,” the official said. “There has been reporting to inappropriately and incorrectly state that there was encryption that the FBI was not able to get into — that is not true. We have been able to get into every single account.”

So they had total access. But they claimed there was nothing of note, even as other investigators publicly disagreed. This is from the New York Post, which actually has more detail than the FBI’s latest document dump:

Doug Hagmann, whose team of six other investigators have been working the case for months and have interviewed more than 100 people, said they also conducted extensive geofencing analysis of cellphones and tablets not belonging to Crooks that were found with him at his home, at the rifle range where he took target practice, at the rally and at Bethel Park High School, where he graduated in 2022. “We don’t think he acted alone,” Hagmann told The Post. “This took a lot of coordination. In my view, Crooks was handled by more than one individual and he was used for this [assassination attempt]. And I wouldn’t preclude the possibility that there were people at the rally itself helping him.” … Hagmann said one of the electronic devices geolocated with Crooks at several different places at the time of the shooting is still pinging today — at Bethel Park High School. .. … FBI officials who served under President Joe Biden accessed Crooks’ phone, computer and his encrypted messaging apps in Belgium, New Zealand and Germany, according to current national security adviser Mike Waltz, a former GOP congressman. However, they have been very tight-lipped about what they found.

So all of this is known to the FBI as of July of 2024. In February 2025, right after inauguration, Trump demanded all available information about the assassination attempt. He told Miranda Devine in a phone call that he wanted “every bit of information” about the two men who tried to murder him during the campaign. “I want to find out about the two assassins. . . . Why did the one guy have six cell phones and why did the other guy have [foreign] apps? “No more holding back because of Biden. . . . I’m entitled to know. And they held it back long enough.”

A few months later, in May 2025, Trump told Bret Baier he has no new information and is relying on his appointees, including Pam Bondi and Kash Patel — though he suggested he didn’t fully trust the answers he was getting. 

Watch:

Two days after this interview, Kash Patel and Dan Bongino went on Fox News to say there was nothing to report. Patel suggests there’s an ongoing prosecution to worry about— even though Thomas Crooks is dead. So — what, is there an accomplice on the loose? He didn’t say. It was all very strange. 

Watch:

They may be right. It’s quite possible there is no grand conspiracy. But that’s not the point. The point is that there are clearly relevant pieces of information that are being withheld from the public — including the identity of the man Crooks was speaking with on the day before the shooting at the gun range, the reason the FBI claimed Crooks never spoke to Willy Tepes, the identity of the person who paid for Crooks’ cremation, the identity of the people paying for Crooks’ parents’ high-profile attorneys, the people Crooks was speaking with on those encrypted apps, the reason the body was released for cremation so quickly, and so on. 

These are all details that, according to the FBI’s own statements, the FBI has information on. But they’re not providing them to the public. Instead, as of May of 2025, they were simply telling us to trust them, and that nothing important was being withheld.

Fast-forward to July of 2025, and Ron Johnson (the Wisconsin senator who chairs the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations) subpoenas Kash Patel, saying the FBI has “repeatedly failed to produce to the Subcommittee records and information critical to its investigation.”

According to Johnson: 

For example, following a briefing on March 21, 2025, by FBI forensic laboratory personnel, the Subcommittee requested copies of all the records, including photographs, presented during the briefing. To date, the FBI has failed to produce to the Subcommittee these records and photographs. Further, on June 4, 2025, after issuing numerous requests to the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) for records, the Committee subpoenaed PSP for records related to the July 13, 2024 assassination attempt.  During a phone call with staff on July 1, 2025, PSP informed Subcommittee and Committee staff that PSP did not possess certain records responsive to the June 4 subpoena, such as security camera footage. According to PSP, the FBI possesses all security camera footage obtained in connection to the July 13, 2024 assassination attempt. For nearly a year, the Subcommittee has attempted to obtain these records and other information, including the aforementioned security camera footage; however, to date, the FBI has failed to produce the requested records.

But the stonewalling continued. In September of 2025, Kash Patel again claims — this time under oath — there’s some mysterious trial preventing the disclosure of more information about Thomas Crooks. This is from the Daily Mail:

FBI Director Kash Patel gave a curious answer when asked by a Congressman to provide details about President Donald Trump’s near-assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks. During a hearing on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, Republican Texas Representative Wesley Hunt noted that he had asked Patel’s predecessor Christopher Wray ‘a very detailed question about Thomas Matthew Crooks, the shooter responsible for the assassination attempt on President Trump’s life.’ …  Hunt then added that he would like to resubmit the questions and asked if Patel would answer them. Patel responded that he could commit to providing a response ‘as soon as the trial is over.’ But there is no trial for Crooks, as he died shortly after firing his shots at then-candidate Donald Trump.

Then in December of 2025, Ron Johnson told Miranda Devine that the FBI still hasn’t been providing any information, and that he’s been relying on subpoenas to telecom companies instead. 

Watch:

Somewhere in this timeline, while Congress was getting stonewalled by the FBI, an anonymous source got Crooks’ phone number from a FOIA request and was able to hack into Crooks’ accounts, where he found that, in fact, Crooks did have a prolific social media footprint. This revelation totally undermined the official FBI narrative that Crooks had no social media footprint — which Kash Patel either didn’t know about or lied about in the earlier interview. 

And now, this week, as the FBI finally starts releasing documents, Trump is flat-out saying that the assassination attempt (and the cover-up) was a Democrat plot:

Everybody knows the Crooked Joe Biden FBI didn’t do what they should have with respect to the Lunatic who shot me in Butler, PA. By the time I got into Office, on January 20th, most of the information was missing, altered, corrupted, or gone. New info was just found! Why wasn’t it seen long ago? This was all a Democrat Plot, to get me out of the Election, that failed. Dirty Cop Christopher Wray should pay a price for the way he handled this assassination attempt, and certainly for the things he said. GOD BLESS AMERICA.

Realistically, we’re a couple of months away from losing control of Congress. That’s almost guaranteed at this point, although no one on the Right wants to admit it. When that happens, congressional subpoena power is gone. Democrats will spend all of their time investigating Trump, filing fake impeachment charges, packing the court, making Puerto Rico a state, and destroying the United States as we know it. 

We are running out of time for an actual accounting of what happened in Butler. If you release all the information, and it turns out Dan Bongino was right, then that’s great news for the country. We should celebrate it. But if the information suggests something else — that deep state operatives tried to murder Donald Trump, because they knew he was about to win the election — then we need a total, non-negotiable purge of the U.S. federal government. And we need it immediately.

Think of how differently things could have played out. Just one day before the Trump assassination attempt, the FBI arrested an Iran-connected operative named Asif Merchant, saying he was plotting to kill Donald Trump. 

If Trump had actually been killed in Butler, it’s conceivable that the deep state would’ve found a way to blame Iran — to say the shooting was tied to Merchant’s conspiracy. They could then install someone like Nikki Haley as the GOP nominee, totally bypassing JD Vance (because remember, he hadn’t been nominated yet). 

Then we could be living through a host of foreign wars right now — even bigger and more destructive wars than the current conflict we’re involved in. Maybe we’d have boots on the ground in Tehran. It’s impossible to know, really. But it’s also not terribly far-fetched, given the sheer magnitude of the deception we’ve all been subjected to over the past two years.

The deception must end. The federal government must tell us everything they know about Thomas Crooks — because it’s very clear they know a lot. 

Otherwise, the next time a threat to the establishment runs for office, they will do the exact same thing. They’ll shoot him in the head in front of millions of people. Barring another miracle, they probably won’t miss the second time around.

More from this network:
Domains for Sale · GOTPeople.org · TheDSAPlatform · The Truth About Socialism

Donate to GOTPeople.org