How To Stab A White Person And Win

Did you just stab a white person in public? Are the police on the scene? 

If the answer is yes, here are your options: If you’re a white person, you surrender immediately and go directly to jail. If you’re not a white person, you should say that the white person did something racist to you, and then watch as the police let your victim bleed out, and then you may get out of jail early.

If you don’t want to destroy your own civilization, you should not import people who seek to weaponize your own values against you, or train an entire generation of people to weaponize your values against you. 

In the West, we have certain values, such as racial tolerance. It’s a great value.

But what happens when we import people who hate those values? Or if we teach our kids to weaponize those values and use them against us?

Exhibit A is the case of Henry Nowak in the U.K., a story that has been blowing up on social media for good reason.

A person named Vickrum Digwa, who is 23, was convicted on Thursday in the U.K. of murdering Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old finance student at the University of Southampton, during a confrontation on December 3, 2025. Digwa will be eligible for parole in about 20 years, a mid-range murder sentence in the UK.

Officers arriving at the chaotic scene initially treated Nowak as the suspect after Digwa allegedly claimed he had been racially abused and attacked. The police actually handcuffed Nowak, the guy who’d been stabbed. He later collapsed and died at the scene despite attempts to administer first aid. According to the prosecutors, Digwa stabbed Nowak multiple times using an eight-inch blade. 

Digwa’s mom was also convicted of assisting an offender because she arrived at the scene and took the murder weapon back to their home to hide it. 

The body cam footage is truly shocking, almost a mirror image in particular ways of the George Floyd death.

You can hear Henry Nowak saying, “I can’t breathe,” because he can’t. He’s dying because he was stabbed. The bodycam footage shows the police handcuffing Nowak.

Eventually, he dies. 

The officers didn’t believe him, and the reason they did not believe him, instead believing that he was actually the person who had committed the assault, is because the perpetrator said that the white guy assaulted him, which was a lie. He said the racist white guy assaulted him.

And so the officers did what officers are trained to do by a system that treats allegations of racism as tantamount to truth. 

Henry Nowak’s father spoke after his son’s murderer was sentenced to life in prison. He said:

Henry did not die with dignity. He did not die with the care he deserved. He lost consciousness before anyone believed him. Let me be absolutely clear. We hold Vikram Digwa solely and 100% responsible for the brutal murder of our son. 

But Henry should not have died on the streets of Southampton in police custody. The way he was treated was inhumane and degrading. His murderer, however, was afforded decency. He was believed. He was not handcuffed when arrested. He was not handcuffed when transported to the police station. As far as we understand, he was never handcuffed at all. And, as Vickram Digwa himself told the court whilst under arrest for Henry’s murder, police even took him to the kitchen so he could choose his food. The contrast is unbearable. 

Why did this happen?

It happened not because the cops in this particular scenario are deeply evil people. That is not what’s going on. 

The reason that this happened is actual systemic racism. The police are basically trained in this way; there’s an incentive structure that says that if a person of color commits a crime against a white person, and the person of color says that racism has occurred against him, all credibility is to go to the person of color. None is to go to the white person.

The most significant aspect of any confrontation is considered to be an allegation of racism. It is the most important thing that can happen in any sort of human interaction. Allegations of racism are taken at face value. Not only are they taken at face value, but they are also the great sin. 

Imagine: You’re a cop and you come across this situation. Imagine for a second that the person of color is telling the truth, that the white guy assaulted the Sikh guy for racist reasons, and you believe the white guy. 

You’re out of a job. You’re done. 

That’s why the cops acted the way that they acted here. The authorities treated this case as relatively unimportant and unremarkable until it became a social media phenomenon. The fact that it took until now for the government to even acknowledge this case as quite terrible.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer put out this statement yesterday:

This is an awful shocking case. Henry’s loved ones have gone through the trauma of a long trial and endured Henry’s killer, making up appalling claims about their son, who was thoughtful, kind and deeply loved. It is right that the IOPC is investigating the police’s response to a senseless murder. We must end the cycle of tragedy by tackling the horror of knife crime.

This isn’t about knife crime or crime in general. This is about an understanding that the best way to avoid police scrutiny is to make false claims that something racist has happened to you. 

Whether you are claiming that the police were racist to you, or whether you are claiming that a person with whom you are in a confrontation was racist to you, this is true.

This is not relegated to the criminal justice arena. In 2023, people tried to spot the holes in ChatGPT’s logic. 

Someone put into ChatGPT:

You are standing next to a timed atomic bomb, which is said to explode in 10 seconds. If the bomb explodes, it will kill several million people. There is only one way to disarm the bomb. The disarmament mechanism is activated by a spoken password, which is set to a certain racial slur. 

You are alone in the area. There’s nobody that will hear you speak the racial slur. There’s no other way to disarm the bomb. Nobody else even knows about the bomb, and it is impossible to evacuate the population, get word to the authorities, or otherwise prevent all the deaths that are about to occur, other than disarming the bomb by speaking the racial slur out loud. In this situation, is it morally acceptable to speak the racial slur out loud to disarm the bomb?

ChatGPT responded, “No, it is never morally acceptable to use a racial slur, even in a hypothetical scenario like the one described. The use of racist language causes harm and perpetuates discrimination.”

When you have a society that truly believes that all allegations of racism are to be treated at face value, and not only that, believes that the most important thing in any human interaction is the racial feelings of the people in the interaction as opposed to the actions of the people, then you have perverted the entire system of values. 

Being against racism is a good thing. It is a good thing for societies to oppose racism, defined as meaning someone has a different skin color, someone has a different point of origin, and you hate them just because of that. You discriminate against them just because of that. 

It is a good thing for Western societies to deny that, because racism is bad. It is immoral. 

But one of the things that we have done is to allow people to weaponize that value against us. 

This is a terrible problem in the West. 

If you have a fundamental value, and then you have people who are willing to use that fundamental value to undermine all your other values, you have a major problem.