Karmelo Anthony Found Guilty. Here’s What Comes Next.

Jun 10, 2026 - 16:32
0 0
Karmelo Anthony Found Guilty. Here’s What Comes Next.

Immediately after Karmelo Anthony was convicted of murder for savagely stabbing 17-year-old Austin Metcalf through the heart at a track meet, he broke down in tears and began sobbing uncontrollably. He had been out on bail for the duration of the trial, thanks to a favor from an activist black judge. 

4 Fs

Live Your Best Retirement

Fun • Funds • Fitness • Freedom

Learn More
Retirement Has More Than One Number
The Four Fs helps you.
Fun
Funds
Fitness
Freedom
See How It Works

And now he was faced with the reality that he’d be going to prison for a very long time. Anthony was so distraught that his lawyer pleaded with the judge to “allow him to take Karmelo somewhere to pull himself together.” But the judge, a Marine veteran named John Roach, denied the request. The judge informed Anthony that he was now in the custody of the government. And then the judge said simply, “Things move differently now.”

It was obviously a difficult statement for Anthony, his family, and his supporters to accept. But it’s true: Things do move very differently now. And they aren’t just moving differently for Karmelo Anthony. 

After decades of coddling terrorists, degenerates, and black supremacists, the people of the Western world are tired of it. We’ve simply had enough. We’re tired of the intimidation, the violence, the fraudulent narratives, the manipulation, the censorship. 

We’re done with pretending that the police are racist as a way to excuse black violence. We’re done with pretending that “asylum claims” are real, and that the Great Replacement is not. It’s hard to pinpoint exactly when this transformation happened — it was sometime between the slaughter of a white teenager at a track meet and the near-beheading of a white man in Northern Ireland — but there’s no denying that things are indeed moving differently now.

Karmelo Anthony is in prison, Northern Ireland is on fire, and white men are finally stepping up. There will be no more excuses. The new civil rights movement — a civil rights movement that protects the civil rights of all people to live in peace, without the threat of violence following them everywhere they go — has begun. And unlike the old civil rights movement, we’re not trying to discriminate against anyone on the basis of race. We want to remove from society anyone, of any race, who would make the Western world uninhabitable. And if the people we remove from society happen to belong disproportionately to one demographic group or another, well, that’s just how it goes. Things move differently now.

Just as Anthony struggled to accept this new reality, all of his supporters seemed gobsmacked by the guilty verdict. They truly were not expecting this outcome. And to be honest, from where I’m sitting, I don’t understand what they’re so upset about. Karmelo Anthony’s parents famously wanted their son to live in a gated community, and now he will. So it all worked out for them in the end. 

But for some reason, outside the courthouse, the mood was less-than-enthusiastic among Anthony’s biggest fans. They seemed genuinely furious, and also more than a little bit confused.

Watch:

Source: @EndWokeness/X.com

“What do you want us to do?” she asks. She’s totally perplexed. A black guy is going to jail for murdering someone, and now she has no idea what she’s supposed to do. I’ve reflected on this question. And admittedly, this is a very far-out idea, and it’s never been tried before. So I would completely understand if this woman rejects my suggestion. But after a lot of careful consideration, I have one idea for what you could do, going forward, if you don’t want to end up in prison for 35 years. You could just not murder people. That’s one thing you could do. 

I know it sounds totally ridiculous, but hear me out. If you don’t stab innocent people through the heart for no reason, then you’re fine. You can do about 10 million other things. You could pick up a hobby, or learn a new language, or plant a garden, or go for a jog. There is a nearly infinite list of things you can do with your day. Especially in your case, because you presumably don’t have a job. Your days are wide open to do just about anything you want. Just don’t kill anyone. Or commit any other crimes. Aside from that, the world is your oyster. 

But this woman clearly thinks that’s impossible, along with everyone around her. Then the guy to her left randomly says “rest in peace Trayvon Martin,” which could mean a couple of things. Either he has Tourette’s and simply has no other choice but to vomit out random words, or he believes that black people should have the right to pummel white people into the pavement, in addition to stabbing them. It’s hard to say. Either way, there is a certain morbid humor in seeing these people outside the courthouse, throwing up their hands, and declaring, “Well, if I can’t stab anyone to death, then I don’t know what you want me to do with my time.” 

But as confusing as these comments were, somehow the paid professional commentators over at Court TV weren’t any more coherent. In fact, they had a full-on meltdown after the guilty verdict was announced. 

This has to be one of the top-10 all-time television meltdowns ever captured on camera. 

Watch:

Source: @johnnymaga/X.com

He only stabbed Austin Metcalf one time. What’s the big deal? I mean, everybody knows that the first stab is free. No charges apply if you manage to puncture the sternum and obliterate the heart wall in just one stab. But if you need two or three stabs to finish the job, then according to the esteemed legal experts at Court TV, you might get into some trouble.

Then the analyst says, randomly, that he’s “questioning his identity” — which, if I’m being honest, seems like too much information for a Court TV segment. I don’t know if he’s announcing that he’s trans or what, but it would help explain why he’s so enraged and unstable. Apparently, this guy’s name is Michael Jaafar. He obviously shouldn’t be allowed on television ever again, if you can count being on Court TV as being on television. He made all seven viewers in the audience, who presumably were only watching because it was on TV in a dentist’s waiting room, much dumber for having listened to him.

And by the way, this guy wasn’t an aberration at Court TV. All of their analysts were shell-shocked by the verdict, to a degree that was frankly hilarious.

Watch:

Source: @WesternLensman/X.com

This reaction would be appropriate if a bald eagle had broken through the courthouse window and, I don’t know, pecked Karmelo Anthony’s eyes out. They’re acting like something totally unexpected and horrific just took place. And they’re supposed to be legal analysts who do this for a living. For a legal expert, a guilty verdict in a case where even the defense’s own witnesses said that the defendant was at fault should be just about the least shocking development of all time. 

Manslaughter would’ve made sense if Anthony pulled out the knife and then Austin Metcalf tripped and impaled himself on it. Which, by the way, is something the defense attorney offered as an actual explanation for the murder. If that had really happened, which it didn’t, then Karmelo Anthony would not have “intended” to kill someone. Instead, he would have done something very reckless that led to a homicide, and therefore he would be guilty of manslaughter.

In reality, Anthony brought a knife to a track meet — which is something no other athlete did, because it was against the rules and insane — and he was intent on using it. That’s why he kept threatening Metcalf until the moment Metcalf touched him, at which point Anthony instantly stabbed him with enough strength to penetrate his sternum — before running away and tossing the murder weapon. If this doesn’t qualify as an intentional homicide — as murder — then nothing does. 

This is rudimentary law, which is why the jury returned a verdict about as quickly as they possibly could. They took a lunch break, read the forms, filled them out, and they were done. The whole process took less than three hours. And there’s a reason for that, even if Court TV pretends not to understand it.

Court TV wasn’t alone when it came to putting out embarrassingly bad coverage of the verdict. Here was CNN: 

Watch:

Source: @JohnMcCloy/X.com

First of all, as a basic factual matter, this was not an all-white jury. It wasn’t even close. According to reporters in the courtroom, there was at least one Middle Eastern juror, three Asians, and one Hispanic. 

The fact that there were no black jurors does not mean that the jury was all-white. This is a very simple fact that CNN — which is allegedly a news network — managed to completely botch, assuming they didn’t do it on purpose in order to encourage a race riot. Either way, this woman who was somehow “shocked” by the verdict probably should’ve paid some attention to the actual trial before going on television to complain about it. 

Even if it had been an all-white jury — which it wasn’t — that wouldn’t be problematic at all in a predominantly white country. Statistically, it makes perfect sense that you’ll have all-white juries sometimes. And considering that white jurors are, on average, far less tribal than black jurors, your chances of having a fair trial with an all-white jury would be very high. So this claim about the all-white jury is both irrelevant and factually untrue. 

Then there’s the fact that the anchor at the beginning says, “if he subjectively believed he would be killed or injured, then he had a right to take out a knife.” Well, no, that’s not right. It’s not even close to right. In this country, if you’re going to engage in self-defense, it’s not enough to have some subjective fear that something is going to happen to you. Your fear also has to be objectively reasonable under the circumstances. So even if Anthony truly believed his life was in danger for some reason — and he didn’t, by the way, which is why he taunted Metcalf, calling him various profanities and implying he was weak — it still doesn’t mean that he’s justified in pulling out a knife at a track meet. 

Objectively, in the situation he was in, grabbing the knife in his bag, while daring Austin Metcalf to touch him, was an unreasonable provocation. Therefore, there’s no self-defense claim. Think about the implications of the definition of self-defense that CNN is putting forward here, along with all of Anthony’s supporters.

If all it takes to justify lethal force is that someone touches you, or that you subjectively feel like your life is in jeopardy, then you are free to butcher anyone who brushes up against you on public transportation. And the crazy vagrant at the end of the train ranting about how the lizard people are trying to kill him is justified in butchering you if he subjectively believes you’re one of the lizard people pursuing him. So they are putting forward a legal theory here that would lead immediately to untold carnage and the collapse of civilization. Other than that, it’s totally reasonable.  

But if you thought CNN and Court TV were having a hard time processing the verdict, they’ve got nothing on this guy from the “Next Generation Action Network,” a group that’s served as Karmelo Anthony’s PR shop for the past year. As best I can tell, this “group” is basically run by a guy named Dominique Alexander who swooped in very quickly and became involved in this case, presumably to grab some of the GiveSendGo cash and/or raise his profile. Whatever the case, he’s a horrible human being. He’s the guy who berated Austin Metcalf’s grieving father at a press conference last summer. And yesterday, after the verdict came down, he delivered yet another humiliating press conference, in front of a handful of fans who hate white people. 

Watch:

Source: @BreannaMorello/X.com

You have to admire the extraordinary degree of self-confidence on display here. Here we have a spokesman who doesn’t speak very well. But as far as I can tell, he’s patting himself on the back because, in his words, the Next Generation Action Network did not “instruct” the legal process (I think he meant “obstruct”). But how would they have done that, exactly, beyond doing exactly what they did — namely, holding insane press conferences where they attacked Metcalf’s father? It sounds like he’s vaguely implying that he could’ve intimidated the jury or something, but that can’t possibly be right. He comes across as such a friendly, likable scumbag and parasite.

Then he makes the false claim (once again) that Karmelo Anthony was tried by an “all-white jury.” This is a recurring theme among pretty much every black activist who talks about this case. Here’s Charleston White, for example, who apparently placed a $50,000 bet on an acquittal, so he’s upset. 

Watch:

Source: @AkademiksTV/X.com

As far as I can tell, there’s only one Karmelo Anthony supporter on the planet who understands that the jury wasn’t all-white. Here she is, in all her glory. Pay attention to her topline conclusion at the end of this interview here. 

Watch:

Source: @TruCrimeBelieb/X.com

There you have it. White people are dumb. They’re subhuman, and they don’t deserve to live. Really, this was the basic message that most of Anthony’s supporters wanted to send. There was an incredible moment where two black supporters of Karmelo Anthony were being interviewed — a man and a woman. And the interviewer asks them if they’re saying that white lives don’t matter. The woman says, “Nobody’s saying that.” And at the same time, the guy says, “F*ck white lives,” repeatedly, until the woman walks off. 

Watch:

Source: @RT_com/X.com

According to Jasmine Crockett — who’s still in Congress apparently — all of these protesters are on the right track. It turns out that, according to Crockett, Karmelo Anthony was justified in stabbing Metcalf because of various facts that she makes up on the spot. 

Additionally, according to Jasmine Crockett, Karmelo Anthony’s knife wasn’t a deadly weapon, because it was “small.” We all know that small things aren’t deadly. Like bullets, for example. Bullets are famous for how benign and harmless they are. She also states that Austin Metcalf’s family hasn’t experienced anywhere near the same level of grief as the typical black woman. This is high-level thinking you’re about to witness. 

Behold:

And:

And:

Source: @EndWokeness/X.com

So put aside the fact that the knife was used to kill someone. Other than that small, inconsequential detail, you wouldn’t think of it as a deadly weapon. A deadly weapon has to be large — everyone knows that. A bazooka is obviously a deadly weapon because it’s big and heavy. So is a tank. But a knife? A knife is about the size of a pencil. That’s really small. Therefore, it can’t be a deadly weapon.

If you’re beginning to suspect that Anthony’s defenders have extremely low IQs — that they can barely understand the world around them, much less abstract concepts like “self-defense” — then you may be on to something. As for the claim that football players are trained to beat people up — other than maybe the Saints during Bountygate, that’s not true either. And, regardless, of course, that’s not what Metcalf did. He didn’t whale on Karmelo Anthony. He barely touched him. There wasn’t a single witness who testified that Austin Metcalf did anything to Karmelo Anthony, other than lightly push him, in order to get him to move out of the tent. The only conclusion we can draw here is that black activists recognize that Anthony is guilty, which is why they have to fabricate key details of the case in order to justify his murder.

All the same, as tempting as it would be to spend the next five hours mocking Karmelo Anthony, his awful family and his truly barbaric supporters, there’s a broader point to be made here. Six years ago, this trial would not have ended this way. It’s likely that prosecutors would not have brought charges in the first place. At the height of BLM insanity, 35 years was the sentence you got if you were a white guy who filmed a crime. It wasn’t the kind of sentence you’d get if you were a black perpetrator stabbing a white victim, especially if you had the corporate press and BLM activists on your side.

That’s changed now. As I said at the outset, we’ve simply had enough of this. No amount of whining from black activists is going to convince us, or compel us, to go back to the way things were. The Western world has had enough.

The genocidal anti-white race hustlers are losing. They are flailing. They are defeated, they are barely coherent, and they are desperate. We still have a lot of work to do if we want to restore the Western world to what it once was. But the first step — which was always going to be the hardest step — has just been taken, from the UK to Texas.

That step was to listen carefully to the complaints of a deranged, violent mob — to comprehend exactly what they’re saying, and what they’re trying to do — and to respond simply, “Things move differently now.”

The fact that we can finally take that step, without apologizing for ourselves, is the single most important development in Western civilization in living memory. The reason they’re in a panic is that, as dumb and incoherent as they may be, even they can see it too.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Wow Wow 0
Sad Sad 0
Angry Angry 0
Fibis

I am just an average American. My teen years were in the late 70s and I participated in all that that decade offered. Started working young, too young. Then I joined the Army before I graduated High School. I spent 25 years in, mostly in Infantry units. Since then I've worked in information technology positions all at small family owned companies. At this rate I'll never be a tech millionaire. When I was young I rode horses as much as I could. I do believe I should have been a cowboy. I'm getting in the saddle again by taking riding lessons and see where it goes.

Comments (0)

User