Federal judge slaps down Ghislaine Maxwell petition for new trial as ‘rambling,’ ‘meritless’

A federal judge rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s latest effort to overturn her conviction, blasting her petition as "lengthy and rambling" and finding her claims "all meritless" and "all or almost all" frivolous.

U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer denied Maxwell’s post-conviction challenge in an opinion filed Monday in the Southern District of New York and made public Tuesday, writing that the evidence against the convicted Jeffrey Epstein associate at trial was "overwhelming."

Maxwell, representing herself, had moved to vacate her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, alleging that her constitutional rights were violated at trial and sentencing.

TODD BLANCHE SAYS 'NO CLOSED INVESTIGATIONS' IN EPSTEIN CASE, VOWS DOJ WILL PURSUE NEW SUSPECTS

Engelmayer said the vast majority of her arguments were procedurally barred because she either raised and lost them on direct appeal or could have raised them earlier but did not.

The judge also shot down Maxwell’s reliance on material released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, finding that the purported new evidence did not support her claims. The supposedly "new" evidence was largely irrelevant to  Maxwell 's case, the judge said.

FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL PAM BONDI HAILS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S 'JUSTICE AND TRANSPARENCY' ON EPSTEIN FILES

"To the extent it is relevant, far from exculpating her, it incriminates her or reinforces the correctness of the legal rulings Maxwell challenges," Engelmayer wrote.

"The Court accordingly denies Maxwell’s petition," he concluded.

Maxwell was convicted in December 2021 on five felony counts stemming from her participation with Epstein in the sexual abuse of young girls over the course of a decade.

Reuters contributed to this report.