Why Detransitioners Are Poised For Massive Wins In Court

For a number of reasons, it appears the more than two dozen detransitioner cases pending in the United States will all render favorable verdicts for those who were mutilated in the name of “transgender care.”

“I’m not in the business of making predictions, but if I had to, I would say that every one of these individuals probably has a case, and I suspect they’re all going to win their judgments,” “Do No Harm” Senior Fellow Dr. Richard Bosshardt told The Daily Wire in a video interview Wednesday.

“I’ll be surprised if they don’t, given the way this has been carried out with very poor informed-consent,” he said.

Medical professionals in these cases were addressing long-term issues and “not even addressing the underlying problems that so many of these children have,” he explained.

“It’s almost every single one of them has one or more major psychiatric or emotional or some other issue — many of which are not even addressed,” Bosshardt added. “The idea is that if they transform their sex into the opposite, that it’s going to solve all their other problems.”

“I would predict there’s going to be a wave of judgments in favor of the plaintiffs in all these cases and I think it’s fantastic,” he reiterated.

On a similar note, it was revealed by independent reporter Benjamin Ryan that a trans so-called expert, then the president-elect of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), admitted during a recent New York detransitioner trial that trans surgeries are not the antidote to suicide.

“Then the president-elect of WPATH testified that such surgeries, in fact, are not a form of suicide prevention, full stop,” Ryan said.

The same admission was made last year by the American Civil Liberties Union’s Chase Strangio in the Supreme Court, when she said that there is “no evidence in the studies that this treatment reduces completed suicide.”

READ MORE: Proponents Of Transgender Procedures Make Shocking Admissions Before SCOTUS

The trial of Fox Varian was the first time a verdict was rendered in a detransitioner case, and Varian, the young woman who had her healthy breasts removed at age 16 in the name of “trans care,” received a $2 million judgement.

On @CBSNews, I reported on the $2M judgment in the 1st detransitioner civil suit to go to trial. I recalled the mother saying her daughter’s psychologist browbeat her into consenting to a gender-transition mastectomy for the 16 year old. But then the president-elect of WPATH… pic.twitter.com/7zjlv6VN7H

— Benjamin Ryan (@benryanwriter) February 5, 2026

The comments from the WPATH leader are extremely significant, since many parents have expressed feeling pressured by medical professionals to “trans” their child over threats of a “dead daughter or son” instead of a trans child of the opposite gender.

In the case of the most well-known detranstioner, activist Chloe Cole, for example, this seems to have been the case. Cole has said that her parents were presented by medical professionals with the insane question, “Would you rather have a dead daughter or a live son?”

Cole, who started transitioning at just 13 years old, is suing Kaiser Permanente. Her case is expected to begin in April.

Another sign that the tide is turning on this transgender madness is the sudden shift from the medical establishment. This past week, both the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the American Medical Association (AMA) pivoted from past full-throated support.

The ASPS released a statement on Tuesday that said available evidence does not support genital procedures or removing the breasts of young girls who identify as boys. The ASPS also said there was “insufficient” support for placing kids on puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.

The AMA, which is the largest medical association in the nation, followed with a similar, albeit a more political statement. “The evidence for gender-affirming surgical intervention in minors is insufficient for us to make a definitive statement,” the AMA said, adding that it “agrees” with the ASPS “that surgical interventions in minors should be generally deferred to adulthood.”

In the AMA’s case specifically, it seems the threat of liability for trans damage to minors, as apparent in the Varian verdict, shifted their stance.

The only real hurdle for these pending detransitioner cases, it seems, would be any potential issues with statute of limitations, Ryan highlighted.

But either way, the “collapse” of “trans care” for minors seems imminent.

“It’s the old dominoes falling analogy where, you know, the first domino drops and pretty soon the entire line of dominoes is falling,” Dr. Bosshardt told The Daily Wire. “I think the whole edifice is going to collapse in due time.”

“I think this will be seen someday as one of the darkest periods of our medical history,” he added.

Related: Another Major Medical Group Reverses Course On Trans Surgeries For Minors