This Insane Moment Belongs In A Dystopian Novel

Mar 10, 2026 - 19:28
 0  2
This Insane Moment Belongs In A Dystopian Novel

If you asked someone to name a famous dystopian novel, they’d probably come up with something like George Orwell’s “1984” or “Animal Farm.” Or maybe they’d mention “Fahrenheit 451” by Ray Bradbury. Or if they’re younger, something like “The Hunger Games.” These are all very well-known works of dystopian fiction, and pretty much every school forces students to read at least one of them.

4 Fs

Live Your Best Retirement

Fun • Funds • Fitness • Freedom

Learn More
Retirement Has More Than One Number
The Four Fs helps you.
Fun
Funds
Fitness
Freedom
See How It Works

What’s interesting about all of these novels is that, in every case, the threat comes from within. You have the dictatorship “The Capitol” in “The Hunger Games,” Big Brother and “The Party” in 1984, the tyrannical pigs in “Animal Farm,” and the fire captain in “Fahrenheit 451.” That’s not a knock against the novels, but it’s worth pointing out. This is the “safe” message that’s approved to teach, in every school in the country. Students are bombarded with the message that domestic authoritarianism is the greatest threat. And then when these students grow up, unsurprisingly enough, many of them are sympathetic to Left-wing messaging about the alleged rise of “fascism” in the United States.

But there is one dystopian novel that focuses on an external threat to a sovereign nation. And appropriately enough, this dystopian novel — unlike all the other ones I mentioned — has been censored relentlessly. No school in the United States will assign it. If you mention that you’ve even read this novel, you’ll instantly be labeled a white supremacist by the editors of The Atlantic. Reading this novel amounts to “wrongthink.” It was first published in the 1970s, but it was quickly dropped by major publishers because it was seen as racist and offensive. Currently, it’s only in print because of a small independent publishing house called “Vauban Books.” I’m talking about the book called “The Camp of the Saints,” by the French author Jean Raspail.

Contrary to what you’re told, this book is not a “white supremacist” screed. Nor is it concerned solely with the rise of domestic “fascism.” Instead, “The Camp of the Saints” is about a threat that’s external to a sovereign nation — specifically, the threat of unchecked mass migration. As the author puts it, the book is not about “Big Brother.” It’s about “Big Other.”

This is one dystopian plotline that you really aren’t supposed to read. But if you do read the book, you’ll quickly come across dialogue that doesn’t exactly mince words, and characters that aren’t exactly subtle.

Certainly, back in the 1970s, the novel might have seemed a little over-the-top and hard to believe. For instance, in the very first chapter, a million foreigners from India are on boats, rapidly heading towards the coast of southern France. And as the foreign armada approaches, a white French hippie barges into the home of an old professor. And the hippie can’t contain his excitement about the foreign flood that’s descending on France, his home country.

He states,

Tomorrow, we won’t recognize this country anymore. It’s going to be reborn. … My real family is all the people coming off those boats. Now I have a million brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers. A million wives.

And then he talks about how he’s going to marry one of the foreigners, and all of his friends are going to do the same thing. And eventually, there won’t be any white people left in France.

I won’t spoil the surprise of what the professor does to this hippie — it’s a book that’s worth reading, is all I’m going to say — but you get the idea. The book is full of quotes like this. And honestly, if you were a reader in France in the 1970s, the dialogue may have seemed fairly unconvincing. After all, who would actually welcome a horde of impoverished foreigners who were in the process of invading their home country? In real life, how many people would have so little respect for their own country, and harbor such obsessive disdain for their own skin color, that they would welcome the invasion of a million hostile migrants from a distant land?

It’s been half a century since “The Camp of the Saints” was published. It’s still one of the only dystopian novels that you’re not allowed to talk about in polite company. But if there was ever any question of whether the characters in the novel were a little over-the-top and unbelievable, that conversation has now ended, as of today.

After what just happened in New York City, we can definitively state that, if anything, “The Camp of the Saints” dramatically undersold the extent of the anti-white and anti-civilizational depravity that would take hold in the West. The book was ahead of its time, in other words.

As of 2026, everyday Leftists walking around the streets of New York have far more suicidal empathy — and harbor far more anti-white hatred — than any character depicted in “The Camp of the Saints.”

DailyWire+

We briefly discussed the terrorist attack in New York yesterday. But in particular, we need to focus on how a man named “Walter Masterson” — who was present during the attack — responded to what he experienced. Masterson was in front of the Mayor’s residence demonstrating in favor of more migration to the United States. He was chanting, through a megaphone, that New York welcomes everyone. And then, as he was saying this, one of the Muslim terrorists jumps up behind him, yells “Allah Akbar” and throws a bomb at the conservative activist Jake Lang.

This is some of the most extraordinary footage you’ll ever see. There are two angles:

Watch:

Source: @waltermasterson/X.com

Source: @ImMeme0/X.com

This is the shot that, more than any other image I’ve ever seen, encapsulates the ideology of modern Leftism.

@ImMeme0/X.com

Screenshot: @ImMeme0/X.com

It’s an emasculated white guy, literally in the act of extolling the virtues of open borders and migration, getting used as a foot-stool by a Muslim bomb-thrower whose parents came here from Afghanistan. It’s a political cartoon playing out in real life. It’s hard to believe it’s real, but it is.

It’s like watching someone who’s trying to convince you to get a pit bull, and then while he’s speaking, a pit bull comes up and mauls him. Actually, it’s worse than that. In that scenario, you’d assume that the guy would probably stop promoting pitbulls after getting mauled by one. But Walter Masterson has not changed his beliefs at all, in the wake of this attack.

Instead he wrote the following on X:

I was in the middle of saying “as a born and raised New Yorker, we welcome everyone into this city” when he threw that over my head.”

And then this:

“And I still stand by it. As a born and raised in New Yorker, everyone is welcome. Everyone except chief goatf—-er Jake Lang.”

And then in a follow-up, Masterson wrote,

Source: @waltermasterson/X.com

On Instagram, Masterson repeated this language.

Source: @waltermasterson/Instagram

Source: @waltermasterson/Instagram

He claimed that the bomb was a piece of “cardboard,” which obviously isn’t true.

Again, he’s like a character from a dystopian novel — an actual dystopian novel.

If you’re tempted to dismiss Masterson as a “performance artist” or a moron, rest assured, he’s not an outlier. To be clear about what happened: Jake Lang, the Right-wing activist, was staging an event outside the mayor’s residence in New York City. He was explicitly calling for the removal of all Muslims from the United States, saying they’re incompatible with this country. In response — before the two terrorists tried to murder Lang — a crowd of white Leftists formed.

And according to TurningPointUSA’s reporters, who were on the scene, the mob of angry white Leftists openly called for Lang’s murder.

Watch:

Source: @RealAmVoice/X.com

We saw this after the murders of Brian Thompson and Charlie Kirk, as well as the attempted assassinations of Donald Trump. An overwhelming number of Leftists — probably a majority at this point — want to see their political opponents get killed. And on top of that, they want to see the downfall of the United States. They want white people to be eliminated from the face of the Earth. They want a true dystopia, in other words.

Nothing illustrates this point more clearly than the response of the mainstream corporate press — including the supposedly “reformed” CBS News — to what happened during this attack on Saturday. First we need to establish what exactly happened.

This is the moment a bomb lands at Jake Lang’s feet.

Watch:

Source: @JakeLang/X.com

That was the first bomb, which did not detonate. Then there was a separate attack, in which one of the terrorists threw a bomb at a police officer — which also did not detonate.

Watch: 

Source: @EricLDaugh/X.com

Source: @mattvanswol/X.com

There’s no mystery about motive here.

 

While one of the terrorists was being transported to jail, he informed officers (without being asked any questions) that he was on a mission to cause more deaths than the Boston Marathon bombing, in the name of ISIS and Islam.

So with that in mind, let’s take a look at how the press covered the story.

Here’s NBC.

Source: @NBCNews/X.com

Of course, the goal of that headline is to make you think that “anti-Islam protesters” placed the explosive device outside the home of the Muslim mayor. The headline is vague, on purpose, to avoid describing what happened. They want readers to believe a lie.

NBC’s New York affiliate did the same thing.

Source: @NBCNewYork

Source: @NBCNewYork

They published the following article: “Multiple arrests made after suspicious devices found outside Gracie Mansion, home of Mayor Zohran Mamdani, during anti-Islam rally and counter-protest.”

Meanwhile, TMZ went with the following headline, which was also inaccurate and wildly misleading.

Source: @TMZ/X.com

Then there was this egregious article from the Guardian.

They plaster Jake Lang’s photo at the top of the article, implying it’s a story about him.

Source: The Guardian

Source: The Guardian

And then the article states: “Explosive Device thrown outside of Zohran Mamdani’s residence at anti-Islam protest. Two men are in custody in connection with the incident after anti-Islam demonstrators clashed with counterprotesters.”

Meanwhile the AP — which provides wire copy to a million different news outlets — deliberately wrote their article to obscure the fact that Islamist terrorists committed the attack.

Here is the headline and first full paragraph from their story:

Headline: Counterprotester threw improvised explosive at anti-Islam event in NYC, police say

A device thrown by a counterprotester at an anti-Islam demonstration in New York City on Saturday was confirmed to be an improvised explosive, according to a preliminary police analysis. As the investigation continued on Sunday, police said they were looking into a second suspicious device found in the same area of Manhattan’s Upper East Side.”

You can read this five times, and come away completely confused by what actually happened. A “counterprotester at an anti-Islam demonstration” is a double negative, essentially. It’s a lot easier to say “An Islamist terrorist threw a bomb at an anti-Islam demonstration.” But that would be a very inconvenient headline, so they bury the facts in word salad. They want to avoid writing the truth, which is that the Muslim terrorist made Jake Lang’s point for him.

CBS was one of the worst offenders.

Here’s what they aired on CBS Evening News. Pay attention to the photo that the producers put on the screen, to the right of the anchor:

Source: @kylenabecker/CBS Evening News/X.com

Again, like the mayor and every other outlet, she doesn’t want to talk about Islam at all.

Instead, they want to imply that white conservatives committed an act of terrorism against the Muslim mayor.

Here’s the New York Post:

Source: @nypost/X.com

So they have to describe Jake Lang as a “right wing nut,” which is pretty remarkable under the circumstances. These terrorists tried to murder Jake Lang, solely because of his political and religious beliefs. But according to the New York post, the terrorists are just “ISIS-loving teens” whose parents “seized the American dream.” But the guy they attempted to blow up, live on camera? He’s a “nut!”

And that’s not even getting into how, exactly, these people came from Afghanistan, one of the poorest countries on the planet, and now own a multi-million dollar home in an exclusive neighborhood? Someone should explain how exactly they pulled that off. Do they own any “lear-ing centers”? And how did they manage to amass this extraordinary wealth, while raising a domestic terrorist? How is it possible that they weren’t aware of what he was doing, and what he believed? How is it possible that they wouldn’t share those beliefs? There’s also the question of how these two terrorists knew each other. (One of the terrorist’s attorneys has suggested they didn’t have any kind of relationship before the bombing).

And more broadly, there’s the most important question of all: Why is it in our interest to import Afghans into this country? No one has ever presented an actual argument for this. Hundreds of thousands of Afghans, who come from a culture that’s completely incompatible with our own, are now living in the United States. Did we ever hold a vote on that? Have we ever run a cost-benefit analysis? Of course not. Instead, we keep hearing stories like this one.

These are questions we should have asked before we allowed the parents of both of these terrorists — Emir Balat and Ibrahim Kayumi — to become naturalized citizens. More importantly, these are the kinds of questions we should have asked before allowing the Muslim population of the United States to double over the past 20 years. Now we’re finding out that, actually, we didn’t “vet” any of these people. We didn’t ensure that they were loyal to the United States, or compatible with civilization. And maybe that’s because, as we’re finding out the hard way, most of them aren’t. And now it may be too late to do anything about it.

On that point, this is a remarkable video I saw last night. It was posted by a correspondent at Reduxx, which does extremely good reporting, especially on trans ideology. The correspondent was in Toronto, walking down a main drag in broad daylight, when she was attacked by a homeless, schizophrenic black man. She says that the police told her the man routinely assaults women, and that he’ll probably be out of jail within 24 hours.

And here’s the video that the Reduxx correspondent posted, showing the man’s arrest.

See what you notice:

Source: @Slatzism/X.com

There’s the police officers making the arrest, knowing full well that the attacker — a schizophrenic black man — is going to be out of jail in a matter of hours. There’s the Somali woman walking by at the end. And in the middle, there’s a car driving by, with an Iranian flag flying. In just this tiny, 12-second video, you can easily detect several clear signs that Toronto is no longer a Western city. It has become the third world.

As Will Tanner suggested the other day, if the Trump administration really wants to take out Iran, they’d force them to invoke the Civil Rights Act. They’d force Iran to open the borders and release all of the criminals in the name of racial equity, as Western nations have done. That’s how you really demoralize and destroy nations. That’s how you make Iran unrecognizable. You do the same thing that made Toronto and New York unrecognizable. And all the while, white Leftists will cheer it on.

Every major city is like this now.

Here’s a relevant dispatch from the New York Times, which was published during the era of peak BLM insanity.

After the death of George Floyd at the hands of the police, Shari Albers, who is white, and many of her progressive neighbors have vowed to avoid calling law enforcement into their community. Doing so, they believed, would add to the pain that black residents of Minneapolis were feeling and could put them in danger.

So all of these progressive white people in this neighborhood — which is near the site of George Floyd’s overdose — decided, as a community, not to call the police. Just two months later, things started to go south.

Homeless people began invading the neighborhood. One of them passed out in the elevator of an apartment building. Two of them overdosed in the park. They began destroying property and causing residents to have nightmares about their imminent deaths. One woman, according to the paper, “had visions of people from the tent camp forcing their way into her home. She imagines using a baseball bat to defend herself.” It goes on and on. The article lays all of this out. But in pretty much every case, according to The New York Times, the locals refused to call the police.

But there’s one exception that’s mentioned in the article. The Times talks about the case of Mitchell Erickson, who was robbed at gunpoint by two black teenagers right outside his home. And surprisingly enough, he decided to call the authorities as soon as the black teenagers cornered him.

Here’s how that played out:

One of the boys pointed a gun at Mr. Erickson’s chest, demanding his car keys. Flustered, Mr. Erickson handed over a set, but it turned out to be house keys. The teenagers got frustrated and ran off, then stole a different car down the street. Mr. Erickson said later that he would not cooperate with prosecutors in a case against the boys. After the altercation, he realized that if there was anything he wanted, it was to offer them help. But he still felt it had been right to call the authorities because there was a gun involved. Two days after an initial conversation, his position had evolved. “Been thinking more about it,” he wrote in a text message. “I regret calling the police. It was my instinct but I wish it hadn’t been. I put those boys in danger of death by calling the cops.

This person is not exceptional. Just like everyone else in his neighborhood, and just like Walter Masterson, and just like the corporate press and every Leftist in this country, he wants to usher in the destruction of Western civilization. The principle of “cause and effect” does not matter to him. Basic survival instincts don’t matter to him.

How are you supposed to “debate” a person like that?

How are you supposed to convince them of anything?

How are you supposed to live alongside them?

Right now, instead of hearing the answers to those questions, you’re hearing a lot about Iran’s activation of “sleeper cells” in the United States. 

This was on Fox News the other day:

Source: @rawsalerts/X.com

That sounds scary. But really, a “sleeper cell” doesn’t have to be like something out of a Mission Impossible movie. It doesn’t necessarily mean that Iran currently employs hundreds of sophisticated operatives within our borders, who are all waiting for the “green light” before they plant bombs or whatever. 

That’s not the problem. The problem is that there are a whole bunch of radicalized foreigners in this country who hate us. And they have the full support of self-loathing Americans who wouldn’t seem remotely out of place in “The Camp of the Saints.” The real dystopia is the one you weren’t allowed to read about in school. And precisely because we’ve been told to ignore that dystopia, it’s now upon us.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Angry Angry 0
Sad Sad 0
Wow Wow 0
Fibis I am just an average American. My teen years were in the late 70s and I participated in all that that decade offered. Started working young, too young. Then I joined the Army before I graduated High School. I spent 25 years in, mostly in Infantry units. Since then I've worked in information technology positions all at small family owned companies. At this rate I'll never be a tech millionaire. When I was young I rode horses as much as I could. I do believe I should have been a cowboy. I'm getting in the saddle again by taking riding lessons and see where it goes.